Enterprise AI Security — Three Guardrails, Three Audit Guarantees.
Every CISO's worry about AI is structural: a prompt-injection attack exfiltrates customer data, an over-permissive LLM writes to the wrong record, a compromised credential triggers unbounded AI spend. Aeion's architecture makes these failure modes structurally hard via 3 enforcement guardrails (RBAC scoping, tool-catalog restriction, cost caps) + 3 audit guarantees (every prompt logged, every action attributed, every approval recorded).
Three Guardrails — Enforced at the Kernel
Each guardrail is non-bypassable from within the AI layer. The platform enforces, not the AI.
Three Audit Guarantees — Recorded, Not Promised
Audit is structural, not vendor-promised.
Compliance Framework Mappings
Specific control mappings for the most-requested certifications.
SOC 2 CC6.1 (Logical Access)
Auth RBAC + MFA + audit log
SOC 2 CC7.1 (Security Incidents)
Neural Bus auto-detect + Sentinel + audit
SOC 2 CC7.2 (Anomalies)
AI behavior monitoring + drift detection
HIPAA §164.312(b) (Audit Controls)
append-only audit log, no delete path; SIEM-exportable
HIPAA §164.312(d) (Person/Entity Auth)
MFA + WebAuthn + step-up
GDPR Article 22 (Automated Decision-Making)
per-action audit trail with attribution
GDPR Article 32 (Security)
CMK encryption + Aegis + audit
EU AI Act (High-Risk AI Systems)
RBAC scoping + audit per action + cost caps
NIST AI Risk Management Framework
risk register + bias monitoring + audit
NIST 800-53 AU-2 / AU-6 / AU-12 (Audit Events)
append-only audit log
NIST 800-53 SI-4 (Information System Monitoring)
Sentinel + Neural Bus
Deployment & Governance Controls
Beyond the platform-wide guardrails, every deployment — there is no separate enterprise tier — includes:
Why structural enforcement beats vendor promises.
Most AI vendors pitch "we'll have a SOC 2" — but their architecture doesn't actually enforce per-user RBAC or per-tenant audit. Aeion's enforcement is at the kernel layer. The LLM cannot bypass RBAC because tool calls go through the access engine. Cost caps cannot be bypassed because the spend check fires before every AI call. The audit log cannot be tampered with because the schema is append-only with no UPDATE permissions. These are structural properties of the platform, not features a vendor can rugpull on. That's the structural advantage compliance officers care about more than "trust me bro" SOC 2 letters.
Bring your security questionnaire.
A 60-minute architecture review walks through RBAC scoping, audit log structure, cost-cap enforcement, and the SOC 2 / HIPAA / GDPR / EU AI Act compliance mappings. We answer questionnaire boxes live.